Architecture, with evidence

Your AI is the interface. NitroBot is the part that has to be right.

How scoped tools, deterministic engines and reviewed commands turn a bot’s proposal into accountable work.

A conversation becomes a checked command

Your AI interprets the request and calls scoped tools through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). NitroBot checks the structured input, evaluates the business rules and returns a result the bot can explain. A convincing answer alone cannot book a resource or authorize an effect.

The application command owns the write. Before a new commitment, it checks current authority, the exact reviewed proposal and the records that proposal depended on. Human review or a previously granted, bounded standing authorization provides permission to proceed.

  1. Your AI
  2. MCP
  3. NitroBot commands
  4. Pure engines
Requests and results flow both ways. Effects require human review or bounded standing authority before a command commits.

Put accuracy in a rerunnable engine

Pure engines receive explicit inputs and return decisions without credentials, database access or provider calls. A scheduler can therefore check capacity and fit using the same rules in a test, an operational host or an isolated simulation.

The source and test links below each explanation let you inspect the mechanism. They establish the scope exercised by repository tests; they are not evidence of a production deployment or a live provider result.